All models
DeepSeek logo

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

By DeepSeek · April 2026

Page last updated on

MoE1M contextReasoning MIT license

Flagship MoE model with 1.6T total parameters and 1M context. Built for advanced reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agent workflows.

Specifications

Total parameters
1.6T (49B active)
Active parameters
49B
Architecture
MoE
Architecture class
DeepseekV4ForCausalLM
Attention
Compressed Sparse Attention (CSA) + Heavily Compressed Attention (HCA)
Context window
1M
Vocab size
129,280
Modality
Text
Precision
FP4 + FP8 Mixed
License
MIT
Released
April 2026
Recommended hardware
8× H2008× B200
Best for
Advanced reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agent workflows

Good to know

  • This page covers the DeepSeek-V4 preview, released on April 24, 2026. It is an early open-weight build. The official V4 release is expected around late July 2026. Benchmarks, pricing, and behavior may still change in the final version.

Architecture

The defining choice of DeepSeek-V4-Pro is the attention stack. It interleaves Compressed Sparse Attention (CSA) with Heavily Compressed Attention (HCA).

  • CSA compresses blocks of the KV cache and attends to only a few relevant entries.
  • HCA squeezes much larger spans into single entries. That way the model keeps a full 1M-token history within reach, without paying dense-attention memory for it.

The payoff is efficiency at long context. At 1M tokens, DeepSeek reports that V4-Pro uses 27% of the per-token inference FLOPs and 10% of the KV-cache memory of DeepSeek-V3.2. The model also adds manifold-constrained hyper-connections (mHC) for cleaner residual flow. It trains with the Muon optimizer on more than 32T tokens. The released checkpoint uses mixed-precision quantization: MoE expert weights in FP4, and most of the rest in FP8.

For more models like this one, browse the full open source LLM directory or read the open source LLM ecosystem statistics.

DeepSeek-V4 transformer block: input tokens are embedded, passed through pre-block mixing into CSA/HCA attention and a DeepSeekMoE feed-forward layer, recombined with residual and post-block mixing, then read out by a prediction head (LM loss) and MTP modules (MTP loss).
Source: DeepSeek-V4 technical report

Benchmarks

DeepSeek published a full benchmark set for V4-Pro. It is strongest at coding and tool use. It leads on LiveCodeBench (93.5%) and Codeforces (3206). It sits within a point of the best score on SWE-bench Verified (80.6%). On broad knowledge tests like GPQA Diamond and HLE, it gives a little ground to the closed frontier models.

DS-V4-Pro Max vs frontier models

Scores published by DeepSeek in the V4-Pro model card. DS-V4-Pro Max runs in Think Max mode. Higher is better on every benchmark shown. Scores marked n/a were not reported.

Opus-4.6 Max GPT-5.4 xHigh Gemini-3.1-Pro High K2.6 Thinking GLM-5.1 Thinking DS-V4-Pro Max

Each model keeps the same color across every benchmark, stacked top to bottom in this order. Hover or focus a row to read all six scores.

MMLU-Pro EM
87.5 #3 of 6
SimpleQA-Verified Pass@1
57.9 #2 of 6
Chinese-SimpleQA Pass@1
84.4 #2 of 6
GPQA Diamond Pass@1
90.1 #5 of 6
HLE Pass@1
37.7 #4 of 6
LiveCodeBench Pass@1
93.5 best
HMMT 2026 Feb Pass@1
95.2 #3 of 6
IMOAnswerBench Pass@1
89.8 #2 of 6
Apex Pass@1
38.3 #3 of 6
Apex Shortlist Pass@1
90.2 best

Separate axis. Rating is not a percentage, so this row is plotted as points on a fitted scale starting at 2,900.

Codeforces Rating
3,206 best
View all scores as a table
Benchmark Opus-4.6 MaxGPT-5.4 xHighGemini-3.1-Pro HighK2.6 ThinkingGLM-5.1 ThinkingDS-V4-Pro Max
Knowledge & Reasoning
MMLU-Pro (EM) 89.1 87.5 91.0 87.1 86.0 87.5
SimpleQA-Verified (Pass@1) 46.2 45.3 75.6 36.9 38.1 57.9
Chinese-SimpleQA (Pass@1) 76.4 76.8 85.9 75.9 75.0 84.4
GPQA Diamond (Pass@1) 91.3 93.0 94.3 90.5 86.2 90.1
HLE (Pass@1) 40.0 39.8 44.4 36.4 34.7 37.7
LiveCodeBench (Pass@1) 88.8 n/a 91.7 89.6 n/a 93.5
HMMT 2026 Feb (Pass@1) 96.2 97.7 94.7 92.7 89.4 95.2
IMOAnswerBench (Pass@1) 75.3 91.4 81.0 86.0 83.8 89.8
Apex (Pass@1) 34.5 54.1 60.9 24.0 11.5 38.3
Apex Shortlist (Pass@1) 85.9 78.1 89.1 75.5 72.4 90.2
Codeforces (Rating) n/a 3,168 3,052 n/a n/a 3,206
Long Context
MRCR 1M (MMR) 92.9 n/a 76.3 n/a n/a 83.5
CorpusQA 1M (ACC) 71.7 n/a 53.8 n/a n/a 62.0
Agentic
Terminal Bench 2.0 (Acc) 65.4 75.1 68.5 66.7 63.5 67.9
SWE Verified (Resolved) 80.8 n/a 80.6 80.2 n/a 80.6
SWE Pro (Resolved) 57.3 57.7 54.2 58.6 58.4 55.4
SWE Multilingual (Resolved) 77.5 n/a n/a 76.7 73.3 76.2
BrowseComp (Pass@1) 83.7 82.7 85.9 83.2 79.3 83.4
HLE w/ tools (Pass@1) 53.1 52.0 51.6 54.0 50.4 48.2
MCPAtlas Public (Pass@1) 73.8 67.2 69.2 66.6 71.8 73.6
Toolathlon (Pass@1) 47.2 54.6 48.8 50.0 40.7 51.8
GDPval-AA (Elo) 1,619 1,674 1,314 1,482 1,535 1,554

Source: the DS-V4-Pro model card. Best score in each row is marked.

Third-party evaluations

The first third-party evaluations landed right after the open-source preview. They line up with what DeepSeek reported. V4 sits in the top tier of open models, and it is strongest at coding.

Arena Code Arena bar chart. GLM-5.1 leads at 1,534, Kimi-K2.6 second at 1,529, DeepSeek-V4 Pro (Thinking) third at 1,456, and DeepSeek-V3.2 twelfth at 1,368.
Code Arena leaderboard. On the Arena Code Arena leaderboard, DeepSeek-V4 Pro (thinking mode) ranks third among open models at 1,456. That is well above DeepSeek-V3.2 at 1,368. Arena called the release a major leap over V3.2. Arena · Apr 2026
Vals AI Vibe Code Bench v1.1 table, open weights view. DeepSeek V4 first at 49.93% accuracy, Kimi K2.6 second at 37.89%, GLM 5.1 third at 31.46%, DeepSeek V3.2 ninth at 5.11%.
Vibe Code Bench v1.1. The Vals AI Vibe Code Bench asks models to build web apps from scratch. DeepSeek V4 is the top open-weight model at 49.93%, far ahead of Kimi K2.6 at 37.89%. V3.2 scored just 5.11% on the same test, so V4 is close to a 10x jump. Vals AI · Apr 23, 2026
Vals AI open weight index. Kimi K2.6 first at 63.94%, DeepSeek V4 second at 63.87%, GLM 5.1 third at 63.17%, with DeepSeek V3.2 far below at 37.58%.
Vals Index, open weight category. In the Vals AI open weight index, V4 finishes second at 63.87%. That is a hair behind Kimi K2.6 at 63.94%, and just ahead of GLM-5.1 at 63.17%. Vals AI · Apr 23, 2026

API pricing

Price is where V4 pulls ahead. V4-Pro serves the same 1M-token context and up to 384K output tokens as the frontier models. Output costs $0.87 per million tokens. That is roughly 94% below GPT-5.4 at $15, and 97% below Claude Opus 4.8 at $25.

Model Input · cache hit Input · cache miss Output
DeepSeek-V4-Pro $0.003625 $0.435 $0.87
DeepSeek-V4-Flash $0.0028 $0.14 $0.28

Per 1M tokens, as of July 21, 2026. Official pricing.

V4-Flash goes lower still, at $0.28 per million output tokens. That is about 99% cheaper than Opus 4.8, and among the least expensive models at any scale. Prompt caching drops V4-Pro input to $0.003625 per million tokens on a cache hit. Workloads that reuse a system prompt, tool schema, or repository context pay a small fraction of the cache-miss price.

Sources: DeepSeek pricing · Claude pricing · OpenAI pricing

What people are saying

“🚀 DeepSeek-V4 Preview is officially live & open-sourced! Welcome to the era of cost-effective 1M context length. DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1.6T total / 49B active params. Performance rivaling the world's top closed-source models.”

DeepSeek

@deepseek_ai

X Apr 24, 2026

“IMO DeepSeek v4 demonstrated utter confidence and competence by not benchmaxxing... just showed up, demonstrated SOTA long context efficiency techniques (CSA, HCA, mHC, flash at 8% cost of pro...), dropped the best open base models in the world, peaced out. BYO posttraining... bravo.”

swyx

@swyx · Latent Space

X Apr 2026

“A few more notes on DeepSeek-V4: it seems to be a ~GPT-5.2/Opus 4.5+ tier model... at 1.6T params they now have a model that's in the same weight class as GPT-5.4... the technical paper is a big deal... the arch is very efficient for long context.”

Lisan al Gaib

@scaling01

X Apr 24, 2026

“DeepSeek v4 is out, and it's groundbreaking... it's the first open model to have solved long context... beats Opus 4.6 on LiveCodeBench... tops GPT-5.4 on Codeforces... the open landscape is competitive across the board, exciting times!”

Merve Noyan

@mervenoyann · Hugging Face

X Apr 2026

“🚀 DeepSeek-V4 Preview is officially live & open-sourced! Welcome to the era of cost-effective 1M context length. DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1.6T total / 49B active params. Performance rivaling the world's top closed-source models.”

DeepSeek

@deepseek_ai

X Apr 24, 2026

“IMO DeepSeek v4 demonstrated utter confidence and competence by not benchmaxxing... just showed up, demonstrated SOTA long context efficiency techniques (CSA, HCA, mHC, flash at 8% cost of pro...), dropped the best open base models in the world, peaced out. BYO posttraining... bravo.”

swyx

@swyx · Latent Space

X Apr 2026

“A few more notes on DeepSeek-V4: it seems to be a ~GPT-5.2/Opus 4.5+ tier model... at 1.6T params they now have a model that's in the same weight class as GPT-5.4... the technical paper is a big deal... the arch is very efficient for long context.”

Lisan al Gaib

@scaling01

X Apr 24, 2026

“DeepSeek v4 is out, and it's groundbreaking... it's the first open model to have solved long context... beats Opus 4.6 on LiveCodeBench... tops GPT-5.4 on Codeforces... the open landscape is competitive across the board, exciting times!”

Merve Noyan

@mervenoyann · Hugging Face

X Apr 2026

Run it yourself

vllm serve deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro
python3 -m sglang.launch_server --model-path deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V4-Pro open source?

Yes. DeepSeek-V4-Pro ships under the MIT license, with open weights available on Hugging Face. You can use it commercially, fine-tune it, and redistribute it without restrictions.

What hardware do I need to run DeepSeek-V4-Pro?

The recommended setups are 8× H200 or 8× B200 GPU nodes. Mixed FP4 + FP8 precision keeps memory requirements manageable despite the 1.6T total parameter count.

What is the difference between DeepSeek-V4-Pro and DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

V4-Pro is the flagship, with 1.6T total parameters and 49B active per token. V4-Flash is a lighter sibling at 284B total parameters and 13B active, aimed at cost-sensitive workloads. Both support a 1M token context window and ship under the MIT license.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Pro perform on coding benchmarks?

Launch coverage reports 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified, the strongest open-weights result at release and roughly on par with leading closed models.

Keep exploring